Mcp
awslabs/mcpApache-2.0⭐ 8,432🔧 365 tools
F6.7SpiderScore (registry)
Official MCP Servers for AWS
⚠ Hard constraint applied: multiple critical issues forces F
Decision
Allow with Risk
Confidence
90%
Mcp has risks — usable with isolation (6.71/10, 3 critical, 2 high).
Recommended Actions
- highRun In Container3 critical vulnerabilities require isolation
- highLimit PermissionsRestrict tool access to minimum required scope
Do Not
- ✗running in production without container isolation
- ✗exposing this tool to untrusted input
Risk Flags (1)
- lowno_input_validation×20MCP tool handler accepts raw string input without validation
How This Was Decided
- positivew=0.5Overall quality score = 6.71/10 (grade F)
- negativew=0.83 critical security issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.52 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 2.7/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-13Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 2.7 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
2.7
Security (34%)
8.8
Metadata (28%)
9.6
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
3.2
Permission Scope
0.4
Side Effects
6.2
Capability Disclosure
1.8
Operational Boundaries
2.5
Security Analysis
8.8
Score
3
Critical
2
High
23
Medium
106
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
106 LOW23 MEDIUM2 HIGH3 CRITICAL
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
10.0
Maintenance (35%)
9.0
Popularity (25%)
9.8
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/awslabs/mcp)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →