Is Mcp File Operations Server safe to use?

Mcp File Operations Server is rated NOT_RECOMMENDED by SpiderRating. Mcp File Operations Server is not recommended — low score (3.36/10) with 0 critical issues.

What are the security risks of Mcp File Operations Server?

Key risk flags: ts_path_traversal (high). Overall security score: 6.8/10 with 0 critical issues.

Are there safer alternatives to Mcp File Operations Server?

Similar tools include: ONLYOFFICE/docspace-mcp, bayllech/context-handoff, ivangdavila/csv. View full comparison at spiderrating.com.

Mcp File Operations Server

bsmi021/mcp-file-operations-serverMIT⭐ 20🔧 13 tools

D3.4SpiderScore (registry)

Use cases:file-ops

Decision

Not Recommended

Confidence

90%

Mcp File Operations Server is not recommended — low score (3.36/10) with 0 critical issues.

Recommended Actions

medium
Limit Permissions
3 high-severity issues warrant caution

Risk Flags (1)

high
ts_path_traversal×3
Potential path traversal -- user input used in file system operations

How This Was Decided

negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 3.36/10 (grade D)
negativew=0.53 high-severity issue(s) detected
negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 2.0/10

Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 2.0 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)

2.0

Security (34%)

6.8

Metadata (28%)

5.4

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity

3.4

Permission Scope

0.0

Side Effects

2.0

Capability Disclosure

3.0

Operational Boundaries

2.2

Security Analysis

6.8

Score

Critical

High

Medium

Low

Findings Redacted

Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.

3 HIGH

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)

9.0

Maintenance (35%)

2.0

Popularity (25%)

4.4

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/bsmi021__mcp-file-operations-server.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/bsmi021/mcp-file-operations-server)

🛡️