Redbook Search Comment Mcp2.0
chenningling/Redbook-Search-Comment-MCP2.0⭐ 408🔧 6 tools
F2.5SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Not Recommended
Confidence
90%
Redbook Search Comment Mcp2.0 is not recommended — low score (2.45/10) with 0 critical issues.
Recommended Actions
- mediumLimit Permissions4 high-severity issues warrant caution
Do Not
- ✗using for security-sensitive tasks
Risk Flags (1)
- hightoken_leakage×4Secret or token may be leaked through error messages, logs, or return values
How This Was Decided
- negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 2.45/10 (grade F)
- negativew=0.54 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 1.4/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 1.4 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
1.4
Security (34%)
6.1
Metadata (28%)
5.0
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
0.0
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
4.0
Operational Boundaries
1.4
Security Analysis
6.1
Score
0
Critical
4
High
0
Medium
6
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
4 HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
7.0
Maintenance (35%)
1.0
Popularity (25%)
7.4
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/chenningling/Redbook-Search-Comment-MCP2.0)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →