Is Interactive Brokers Mcp safe to use?

Interactive Brokers Mcp is rated NOT_RECOMMENDED by SpiderRating. Interactive Brokers Mcp is not recommended — low score (2.0/10) with 2 critical issues.

What are the security risks of Interactive Brokers Mcp?

Key risk flags: child_process_injection (critical), hardcoded_credential (high), token_leakage (high). Overall security score: 6.0/10 with 2 critical issues.

Are there safer alternatives to Interactive Brokers Mcp?

Similar tools include: ravinahp/flights-mcp, 2233admin/http-retry, 0xtbug/telbot. View full comparison at spiderrating.com.

Interactive Brokers Mcp

code-rabi/interactive-brokers-mcpMIT⭐ 77🔧 15 tools

F2.0SpiderScore (registry)

Use cases:api-integration payments

⚠ Hard constraint applied: critical vulnerability

Decision

Not Recommended

Confidence

90%

Interactive Brokers Mcp is not recommended — low score (2.0/10) with 2 critical issues.

Recommended Actions

high
Run In Container
2 critical vulnerabilities require isolation
high
Limit Permissions
Restrict tool access to minimum required scope

Do Not

✗running in production without container isolation
✗using for security-sensitive tasks

Risk Flags (5)

critical
child_process_injection×2
Command injection â€” child_process.exec() with non-literal command
high
hardcoded_credential×3
Hardcoded credential -- secret value embedded in source code
high
token_leakage
Secret or token may be leaked through error messages, logs, or return values
high
ts_path_traversal
Potential path traversal -- user input used in file system operations
medium
input_reflection×2
User input reflected directly in tool output -- may enable prompt injection via reflection

How This Was Decided

negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 2.0/10 (grade F)
negativew=0.82 critical security issue(s) detected
negativew=0.55 high-severity issue(s) detected
negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 2.3/10

Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 2.3 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)

2.3

Security (34%)

6.0

Metadata (28%)

8.1

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity

3.2

Permission Scope

0.0

Side Effects

2.0

Capability Disclosure

4.4

Operational Boundaries

2.6

Security Analysis

6.0

Score

Critical

High

Medium

Low

Findings Redacted

Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.

2 CRITICAL5 HIGH2 MEDIUM

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)

10.0

Maintenance (35%)

7.0

Popularity (25%)

6.7

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/code-rabi__interactive-brokers-mcp.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/code-rabi/interactive-brokers-mcp)

🛡️