Logseq Mcp
dailydaniel/logseq-mcpMIT⭐ 32🔧 10 tools
D3.8SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Allow with Risk
Confidence
90%
Logseq Mcp has risks — usable with isolation (3.75/10, 0 critical, 2 high).
Recommended Actions
- mediumReview Before ProductionModerate quality score — manual review recommended
Risk Flags (2)
- hightoken_leakage×2Secret or token may be leaked through error messages, logs, or return values
- mediumssrfPotential SSRF -- unrestricted network requests with user-controlled URLs
How This Was Decided
- negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 3.75/10 (grade D)
- negativew=0.52 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 2.1/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 2.1 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
2.1
Security (34%)
7.4
Metadata (28%)
5.7
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
2.8
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
4.0
Operational Boundaries
2.4
Security Analysis
7.4
Score
0
Critical
2
High
1
Medium
0
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
1 MEDIUM2 HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
9.0
Maintenance (35%)
2.0
Popularity (25%)
5.5
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/dailydaniel/logseq-mcp)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →