Sugar

roboticforce/sugarNOASSERTION58🔧 35 tools

F2.0SpiderScore (registry)
⚠ Hard constraint applied: critical vulnerability
Decision
Not Recommended
Confidence
90%

Sugar is not recommended — low score (2.0/10) with 3 critical issues.

Recommended Actions

  • high
    Run In Container
    3 critical vulnerabilities require isolation
  • high
    Limit Permissions
    Restrict tool access to minimum required scope

Do Not

  • running in production without container isolation
  • exposing this tool to untrusted input
  • using for security-sensitive tasks
Risk Flags (3)
  • critical
    command_injection
    Command injection risk — subprocess called with shell=True and non-literal command
  • critical
    sql_injection
    SQL injection — .execute() called with f-string (user input may reach query)
  • critical
    metadata_secret_leak
    Hardcoded secret or API key found in source code
How This Was Decided
  • negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 2.0/10 (grade F)
  • negativew=0.83 critical security issue(s) detected
  • negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 1.9/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1

Description Quality

Composite: 1.9 / 10

3-Layer Breakdown

Description (38%)
1.9
Security (34%)
5.5
Metadata (28%)
8.3

Description Dimensions

Intent Clarity
3.2
Permission Scope
0.6
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
2.0
Operational Boundaries
2.4

Security Analysis

5.5
Score
3
Critical
0
High
0
Medium
7
Low

Findings Redacted

Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.

3 CRITICAL

Metadata Health

Provenance (40%)
10.0
Maintenance (35%)
8.0
Popularity (25%)
5.9

Badge

Add this badge to your README:

[![SpiderRating](https://spiderrating.com/badge/roboticforce__sugar.svg)](https://spiderrating.com/servers/roboticforce/sugar)