Claudekeep
sdairs/claudekeepMIT⭐ 12🔧 3 tools
D3.3SpiderScore (registry)
Decision
Not Recommended
Confidence
90%
Claudekeep is not recommended — low score (3.29/10) with 0 critical issues.
Recommended Actions
- mediumLimit Permissions3 high-severity issues warrant caution
Risk Flags (2)
- highhardcoded_credential×2Hardcoded credential -- secret value embedded in source code
- hightoken_leakageSecret or token may be leaked through error messages, logs, or return values
How This Was Decided
- negativew=0.5Overall quality score = 3.29/10 (grade D)
- negativew=0.53 high-severity issue(s) detected
- negativew=0.3Tool description clarity score = 1.8/10
Source: SpiderRating automated security scanUpdated: 2026-03-22Protocol: v1.1
Description Quality
Composite: 1.8 / 10
3-Layer Breakdown
Description (38%)
1.8
Security (34%)
7.0
Metadata (28%)
4.9
Description Dimensions
Intent Clarity
0.0
Permission Scope
0.0
Side Effects
2.0
Capability Disclosure
6.0
Operational Boundaries
1.6
Security Analysis
7.0
Score
0
Critical
3
High
0
Medium
0
Low
Findings Redacted
Detailed security findings are hidden during the 90-day responsible disclosure window. Maintainers have been notified.
3 HIGH
Metadata Health
Provenance (40%)
8.0
Maintenance (35%)
2.0
Popularity (25%)
4.0
Badge
Add this badge to your README:
[](https://spiderrating.com/servers/sdairs/claudekeep)🛡️
Protect Your Agents
Get a free API key. Every MCP tool call checked against 15,923 rated servers in real-time.
Get Free API Key →📊
Monitor All Your Servers
Dashboard for your entire MCP portfolio. Score tracking, alerts, and compliance reports.
Start Free Trial →⭐
Scan Locally (Open Source)
Run SpiderShield on your own machine. 46+ security rules, zero data leaves your system.
Star on GitHub →